Knowledge can be judged on its quality and though it can be obtained from any source, that source is not quantified to be accurate. A person can easily receive quality knowledge from an individual discipline since it is diametrically interconnected to its historical development. I doubt this claim can be disproved due to it being corroborated by the progression in different fields of study. Basically, the powerful determinant affecting our perception of things in out lives is historical academic discipline yet still, there are two ways a quality of influence is directed; negatively and positively. I would be expressing my thoughts through some areas of knowledge such as arts and history and through ways of knowing such as Faith, Memory and Reason since I believe that they are inter-meshed with what the prompt is asking.
To begin with, the illation that we keep on educating and understanding history at the same time, we are erroneously showing our perception on the representation of time and our false derivations from our understandings must be embellished. A case that occurred in Turkey with the Turkish government in response to the repercussion that occurred between 1915-1917 can in my opinion only be depicted as lack of knowledge towards history. They currently are unable to bear the fact the world’s perception to “genocide” is emerged to be one relating to the occurrences that took place. From this a knowledge question can be formulated; ” To what extent does bias play a role throughout history and it accompanying present-day development?” This topic is essential as it would be able to discuss the inclination or prejudice towards history relating to the current world. Due to the influence caused by those in the government position, it is said that the schools that are funded from them (public schools) matriculates almost everyone available for school in their respective countries and the outcome of this is a high impact towards the system put in place, therefore, causing a rigid after effect on the knowledge being obtained by the students in that country. People are said to be ineffective when they need to know what they have not been able to perceive and therefore cannot decrypt the different influences, just like that of the government and the policies they create. These policies not only keep the country in shape but also limit the knowledge of the individuals in that specific country due to a policy being a rule set up to help keep a country in shape. The two years, 1915-1917 in comparison to the birth of the country till now, had a great impact on the people in the country and the quality of knowledge that they obtain. Also, citizens in that country that have no knowledge on what goes on beyond their walls; such as the poverty-stricken individuals (citizens or not) who stay in the rural areas. The highly innovative individuals, however, are all situated around themselves, most away from the impoverished. Majority of the individuals believing that the events could not be associated to genocide shared a similar thought with the government in relation to the distortion of their reasoning and the ripple of this was the loss in recognition from a lot of countries and from this, were unfit to obtain contemporary knowledge from those countries. The rest of the individuals (minority), were those who gave an opposition where they concluded the events that occurred were associated with genocide and they did not only oppose the governments decisions but extended their potential to reason to contain the rumination that organizations including their government have to be ameliorated on and have to cease with the unbiased as all of these things can cause their downfall to be tragic.
If the limitations of knowledge have overtaken one side of a coin, the other side should contain the advancements. Time periods are understandably portrayed to show a lack in knowledge and its diminutions. The enlightenment period which was between the sixteenth century to the eighteenth century was spread across the world and this period contained moments that sparked philosophers such as John Locke who developed theories during this period especially when he stated that ” No man’s knowledge here can go beyond his experience”. A deduction can be made that if the “man” were considered to be knowledge then, the period of growth in historical events in a discipline would be his “experience”.
In association with this, current historical and political outcomes of the imperial supremacy have colossal effects on regions and
To add up, due to a recast in perspectives from these changes, one must take heed that a successor from past events or history consolidates history. This can therefore not fail a person if used by their side just like in Christianity, I always had faith a and believed in the knowledge I acquired from my parents about this religion but later in my life I realized due to the influence of friends and subjects such as theory of knowledge that question your thoughts and memories that, I do not have concrete proof of what I claimed. I, therefore, did my own research on the Bible and its scriptures and was able to link some written prophecies, which have occurred, but was still unable to connect some of the dots together mainly because of a limitation in the documentation but found some artistic images of Jesus and his disciples and followers. All of this intrigued but was unable to discover all the “hidden code”.
Not only is the Bible quite subjective but art is also biased. An example is “Look for example of bias in art”. Though they are both biases in their own ways this allowed an expanse in my way of joining thoughts and was able to, when found some art about Jesus, reconsider my faith and allowed me to cling more on this newly developed Faith. Art is used to expand the thoughts of the audience and the artist does this help express that which he cannot speak about. Therefore the audience is able to also understand the work of the artist the same way I understand both my faith and the faith of the artist. But not every thought of the art is identical; this is due to different stimuli the person is from. All of this simply allows one to join two dots together hence an increase in the quality of knowledge the person receives from the different ways historical events are packaged.
Though the world is ever evolving, there are still individuals who lack or are unable to have ingress to important information this, therefore, means that they might be in a Low economically developed country (Ledc). I always believed in the distinction and diversity in religion but what about the Ledc countries? Togo which is a small country in the continent Africa has considered voodoo as their “religion” as 51% of its population practice voodoo, 20% follow Christianity and 19% Muslim. This also has an effect on the trends in the country such as in schools and other buildings as they are all based on the most populated religion voodoo meaning for example in the schools, voodoo is taught and practiced. Most don’t have a say in political events, therefore, a claim can be developed on whether these countries compared to modern countries influence their population any less. This influence has caused Togo to have some restrictions such as their limit in searching for other religions and this created a relentless environment where no one in their population wants to try to invent hence making themselves irrelevant to the cause.
The basis is that there are other influences that affect “the quality of knowledge produced by an academic discipline”, and this “is directly proportional to the duration of historical development of that discipline”. Government influence, bias, and other strong factors influence the creation of historical documents and due to this, predictions cannot be made. Is the quality of knowledge sufficient enough to say that knowledge represents a defeat in another discipline? We, therefore, cannot state that the knowledge we have obtained is fully verified and that there is not a perfect understanding of the discipline. The quality of this can also be either positive or negative and is controlled by the opinion of any participating individual. This can, therefore, be understood that though there are different levels of knowledge and can be in any form, they are specified by the caliber at which participating individual views it.